Professors, Start Your Blogs

With a new school year about to begin, I want to reach out to other professors (and professors-to-be, i.e., graduate students) to try to convince more of them to start their own blogs. It’s the perfect time to start a blog, and many of the reasons academics state for not having a blog are, I believe, either red herrings or just plain false. So first, let me counter some biases and concerns I hear from a lot of my peers (and others in the ivory tower) when the word “blog” is mentioned.

Despite the fact that tens of millions of people now have blogs, the genre is still considered by many—especially those in academia—to be the realm of self-involved, insecure, oversexed teens and twentysomethings. To be sure, there are plenty of blogs that trace the histrionics of adolescence and its long, tortured aftermath. And there’s no denying that other blogs cover such fascinating, navel-gazing topics as one man’s love of his breakfast (preferably eggs Benedict, if you must know). And—before I throw too many stones in this glass house—I too have indulged in the occasional narcissistic act in this column (not to mention the “shameless plug” for my book, Digital History, in the right column of my home page).

But this common criticism of the genre of the blog has begun to ring hollow. As Bryan Alexander of the National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education recently noted at a meeting I attended on emerging web technologies and higher education, a remarkably wide range of blog styles and genres now exist—including many noteworthy examples by professors. There are blogs by historians providing commentary on current events, blogs by journalism professors dissecting mass media coverage of health news, and blogs by whole academic departments, like Saint Cloud State University’s astronomy department.

Blogs are just like other forms of writing, such as books, in that there’s a whole lot of trash out there—and some gems worth reading. It just depends on what you choose to read (or write). And of course many (most? all?) other genres of writing have elements of self-promotion and narcissism. After all, a basic requirement of writing is the (often mistaken) belief that you have something to say that’s important.

Second, no rule book mandates that one adopt the writing style of a hormone-crazed college student. Professors, especially those in the humanities, have spent a great deal of their lives learning how to write prose, and to write in a variety of styles for different purposes: monographs, popular works, reviews, lectures to students, presentations to colleagues. For this blog I’ve adopted a plainspoken prose style with (I hope) a little humor here and there to lighten the occasional technically complex post. I’ve also carefully avoided the use of extreme adjectives and hyperbole that are common on the blogs the academic critics love to hate. I’m proud to say I’ve used only a handful of exclamation points so far. This “casual rationalist” voice is but one option among many, but it’s a style I’ve crafted to disarm those who believe that blogs can be nothing but trouble for the careers of graduate students and professors.

Another factor that has distanced professors from blogs was anonymity. Most early blogs, and especially the ones the media liked to cover, were anonymous or pseudonymous. But I would say that the vast majority of new blogs are clearly attributed (even if they have odd monikers, unlike the boring Attribution and its associated goods, such as responsibility and credit, should make academics feel better about the genre.

Moreover, as I pointed out when I began this blog last year, a blog is really just a series of “posts” (whatever those are; I began the post you’re reading by calling it an “article,” because at almost 2,000 words it feels less like a post-it note than a legal pad). There’s no blogging requirement to discuss botox or baked beans or boyfriends, or to write short, snarky bits rather than long, balanced, thoughtful essays. A failure to understand this simple point has kept too many serious folks like professors on the sidelines as the blogosphere has exponentially expanded.

The addition of professorial blogs to the web will enrich the medium greatly. The critics of blogging are perhaps onto something when they note that the blogosphere has too many people writing on too few topics (does the world really need another blog on the latest moves of Apple Computer?). Although they frequently teach broad, introductory courses, professors are hired and promoted because they are specialists who discover and explain things that few others understand. For these theorists and researchers, blogging can be a powerful way to provide “notes from the field” and glosses on topics that perhaps a handful of others worldwide know a lot about. While I tend to avoid the hot term of the moment, professors are the true masters of the “long tail” of knowledge.

When I was in graduate school, the Russian historian Paul Bushkovitch once told me that the key to being a successful scholar was to become completely obsessed with a historical topic, to feel the urge to read and learn everything about an event, an era, or a person. In short, to become so knowledgeable and energetic about your subject matter that you become what others immediately recognize as a trusted, valuable expert.

As it turns out, blogs are perfect outlets for obsession. Now, there’s good and bad obsession. What the critics of blogs are worried about is the bad kind—the obsession that drives people to write about their breakfast in excruciating detail.

Yet, as Bushkovitch’s comment entailed, obsession—properly channeled and focused on a worthy subject—has its power. It forges experts. It stimulates a lifelong interest in learning (think, for a moment, about the countless examples of “retired” professors still writing influential books). The most stimulating, influential professors, even those with more traditional outlets for their work (like books and journals) overflow with views and thoughts. Shaped correctly, a blog can be a perfect place for that extra production of words and ideas. The Chronicle of Higher Education may love to find examples of Ph.D.s losing a tenure-track job because of their tell-all (anonymous) blogs, but I suspect that in the not too distant future the right type of blog—the blog that shows how a candidate has full awareness of what’s going on in a field and has potential as a thought leader in it—will become an asset not to be left off one’s CV.

The best bloggers inevitably become a nexus for information exchange in their field. Take, for instance, Lorcan Dempsey’s blog on matters relating to libraries and digital technology. It has become a touchstone for many in his field—my estimate is that he has a thousand subscribers who get updates from his blog daily. Overall, I suspect his blog has more actual readers than some print publications in his field. Looking for influence? A large blog audience is as good as a book or seminal article. A good blog provides a platform to frame discussions on a topic and point to resources of value.

Altruistic reasons for writing a blog also beckon. Writing a blog lets you reach out to an enormous audience beyond academia. Some professors may not want that audience, but I believe it’s part of our duty as teachers, experts, and public servants. It’s great that the medium of the web has come along to enable that communication at low cost.

Concerned about someone stealing your ideas if you post them to a blog? Don’t. Unless you decide otherwise, you have the same copyright on words you write on a blog as those published on paper. And you have the precedence that comes with making those words public far earlier than they would appear in a journal or book.

Worried about the time commitment involved in writing a blog? The constant pressure to post something daily or weekly? This was my stumbling block a year ago when I was thinking of starting a blog. I’m busy; we’re all busy. What I’ve found, however, is that writing a blog does not have to take a lot of time. Promoters of blogs often tell prospective bloggers it’s critical to post frequently and reliably. Nonsense. Such advice misunderstands what’s so great about RSS (Really Simply Syndication), the underlying technology of blogs that notifies people when you have a new post. RSS “pushes” new material to readers no matter the interval between posts. RSS is thus perfect for busy people with blogs who are naturally inconsistent or infrequent in their posting schedule. If you post every day, then readers can just visit your site daily; if you post six times a year, randomly (when you really have something to say), RSS is the technology for you. Without it, no one would ever remember to visit your website.

RSS also allows aggregation of blog “feeds” so that by mixing together a number of RSS files an audience can track the goings-on in a field in a single view. I would love to see a hundred historians of Victorian science have blogs to which they post quarterly. That would mean an average of one thoughtful post a day on a subject in which I’m greatly interested.

For those who need further prodding to get past these worries and biases, blogging as we know it (or don’t know it, if you are unfamiliar with the use of RSS “news readers”) is about to change. Seamless support for RSS is now being written into the most commonly used software: email programs and web browsers. Rather than having to figure out how to manage subscriptions to blogs in a news reader or on an off-putting “Web 2.0” site, the average user will find soon find new posts along with their email, or beckoning them from within their browser. And new versions of Blogger and other blog software has made it easier than ever to start a blog. In other words, blogs are about to become much more accessible and integrated into our digital lives.

Now, I’m aware the irony of imploring, on a blog, professors who don’t have a blog to start a blog. I fear I’m preaching to the choir here. Surely the subscribers to this blog’s feed are blog-savvy already, and many undoubtedly have their own blogs. So I need your help: please tell other professors or professors-to-be about this post, or forward the URL for the post to appropriate email lists or forums (if you’re worried that the long URL is difficult to cite, here’s a tiny URL that will redirect to this page:

But wait—haven’t I just asked you to be an accomplice in a shameless, narcissistic act typical of blogs? Perhaps.

60 responses to “Professors, Start Your Blogs”

  1. […] August 29, 2007 Filed under: Uncategorized — hmprescott @ 12:06 pm A recent post on Dan Cohen’s Digital History Blog reminded me to update my blog and use it to brainstorm about ideas for using my recently acquired […]

  2. Am I the only one in my department who blogs?…

    This occured to me as a result of reading some other academic blogs, one of which deals specifcally with technology in history teaching (the excellent edwired).   It lead me to thinking about whether I could be encouraging  colleagues to blog, as I …

  3. […] fandom, and overheated conspiracy theorists, think again. In a much-discussed posting, “Professors, start your blogs,” Dan Cohen takes a comprehensive look at the pro’s and con’s (mostly pro’s) […]

  4. […] Professors, Start Your Blogs An oldie but goodie (and new to me). Walk the walk! (tags: linklog edblogging blogging) […]

  5. […] Professors, Start Your Blogs — An oldie but goodie (and new to me). Walk the walk! […]

  6. […] Posted on September 12, 2008. Filed under: Digital History | Tags: teaching | I met with my digital history graduate  seminar for the first time this week. [as you all know, I was at a conference across the pond.  My substitute showed students how to do blogs, all the while saying she thought they were useless — perhaps I should have her read this article?] […]

  7. […] in my digital history course to read and write a response to Dan Cohen’s article, “Professors Start Your Blogs.” Regular readers of this blog know that I’ve been invited to be part of a panel on […]

  8. […] Dan Cohen, “Professors, Start Your Blogs“ […]

  9. […] blog was that despite its inauspicious beginnings and high-profile overcaffeinated incarnations the genre of the blog has always been well suited to the considered pace and output of the […]

  10. I’ve been blogging for three years now on the HASTAC ( as Cat in the Stack, mostly focusing on digitality and cognition, new media, learning, and the new humanities. But even better, our HASTAC Scholars program began, in summer of 2008, having 56 grad and few undergrad students blogging too, in forums and in topics of their choosing, and it is lively, popular, exciting, and helping a new generation make their learning public. If the humanities are going to flourish, this is what we need to do, claim our space in the world!

  11. […] urging professors and graduate students to start blogs, “Professors, Start Your Blogs” ( does a good job at dismissing, or at the very least, allaying fears academics may have had about […]

  12. […] will admit, however, that Cohen does provide some valid points in his post Professors, Start Your Blogs. In this piece, Cohen stresses the positive aspects for using blogs as an educational tool. And […]

  13. […] response to Dan Cohen By jackielevesque In “Professors, Start Your Blogs,” Dan Cohen addressed some of the common misconceptions about blogs. In addition, he showed […]

  14. […] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Memory, History and Morality… an email to my dad. […]

  15. […] came across an article-post by Cohen while exploring Hacking the Academy titled “Professors Start Your Blogs”  that made me realize I wanted to be a part of what he was talking […]

  16. Well, I’m not a professor but was a history lecturer at an FE college. I was wary of starting a blog because of the perceived ‘chaviness’, but I needed an outlet for my thoughts since retirement. I am looking on my blog as a form of Family History writing to help my own family understand what makes me tick! My ‘name’ is a fiction, but those who have been taught by Prof Lisa Jardine at CELL may realise to what it refers.

  17. […] Dan Cohen, “Dan Cohen’s Digital Humanities Blog: Professors, Start Your Blogs,” 5 0 Collecting History Online in Daniel Cohen and Roy Rosenzweig, Digital History: A Guide to […]

  18. […] about literature and philosophy, art and ideas. I cheered what I thought was a great example of a professor blogging, until I hit this paragraph: For the record, he does not call this a blog, partly, he says, because […]

  19. […] research tools (there is more than Zotero?) I also read an interesting blog post by Dan Cohen about why academics should spend time blogging (warning: it’s from 2006, which makes it archaic in internet-years). Okay, that should do it […]

  20. […] our head about the topic we’re currently thinking about, and the act of writing is a way to satisfy our obsession and communicate our ideas to others. Being a scholar is an affliction of which scholarship is a symptom. If you’re publishing […]

  21. […] in case you’re new to this blog, my views on academic blogging from […]

  22. […] Check out Larry Cebula’s “Advice for Academic Bloggers” and Dan Cohen’s “Professors, Start Your Blogs” for more helpful readings. This entry was posted in Blogging, Blogging Humanities. Bookmark the […]

  23. […] really cannot express the reasons why academics should blog any better than the 2006 piece, “Professors, Start Your Blogs,” written by my colleague Dan Cohen, the director of the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History […]

  24. […] blog” in June I had very little to go on besides Dan Cohen‘s seminal 2006 post “Professors, Start You Blogs.” Yes, there were hundres of blogs by academic historians (both gainfully employed professors […]

  25. […] a workshop on blogging for historians, something he’s been advocating on his own blog since 2006. There has been another round of discussion on the internets on the issue of academic blogging. […]

  26. […] posts by Drew Conway and Dan Cohen have motivated me to action. The value of blogging, as a graduate student and as a member of the […]

  27. Academic blogs can be great (and here I’m thinking of humanities blogs, rather than digital humanities blogs, which do seem to speak a specialized language). But I do need to spend some time in the day doing my actual, you know, job! of teaching and researching.

  28. […] lots of encouragement from Brian Sarnacki, Jason Heppler, and Dan Cohen, (via this post), I realized I have waited far too long to put together a blog. I will be posting some reviews and […]

  29. […] 4. 3 tips for science communications – A good list of tips for crafting engaging writing about science. The beautiful part of this list (with tips like “Story is not a dirty word”) is that the tips are applicable for writing in nearly every discipline.  […]

  30. […] But the guides to academic blogging included in our additional readings, especially the oft-linked Professors – Start Your Blogs, stopped this generalised whining and made me wonder if academic blogging might be a useful […]

  31. […] Dan Cohen views on academic blogging […]

  32. […] Professors, Start Your Blogs […]

  33. […] and twentysomethings”.  Cohan notes here (this quote was taken from his blog – see here ‘Professors-start-your-blogs‘ that blogs are often viewed negatively in academia because they were originally used as […]

  34. […] leave your online identity to your department webpage or Facebook or Google. Own your identity, start blogging, start sharing ideas, learn how to set up things on a server securely. Having a server of your own […]

  35. […] on other days – for instance when I simply copy and pasted lecture notes. I can thus only endorse Dan's Cohens classic piece: scholars should blog without […]

  36. […] to educate their students on history could be seen as a stretch.  I feel that Dan Cohen, “Professors, Start Your Blogs” brings up many quality advantages of blogging history, but there is too many useless and […]

  37. […] took at the Center for HIstory and New Media.  Initially, I was skeptical about Dan Cohen’s recommendation that academics should blog.  Who has the time?  I was also worried that putting my ideas out […]

  38. […] a blog (or, as he calls it an “article”) entitled “Professors, Start Your Blogs“, Dan Cohen argues that professors and other academics such as graduate students (whom he […]

  39. […] for it. So that no one is lost while reading this post, the class was simply told to read a blog post written by Dan Cohen, an ex history Professor, and current blogger, and to respond to his claim of […]

  40. […] response (kind of) to the article/blog of “Professors, Start Your Blogs,” by Dan Cohen ( The idea of blogs being written by professors is an interesting one, and when I look at it could […]

  41. […] this week, though instead of a rallying cry to produce more content online as he did in his blog post advocating for more historical scholars to create blogs of their own, which I discussed here, he is […]

  42. […] All you can tweet. Nature Chemistry , 5. Cohen, D. (2006, 08 21). Professors, Start Your Blogs. . Conole, G. (2007, 10 20). The nature of academic discourse. 02 01, 2014,  […]

  43. […] members of the academic community from participating in these twenty-first century projects. As Daniel Cohen points out, blogs allow academics with extremely limited technical skills to expand their reach and […]

  44. […] Dan, COHEN, « Professors, Start Your Blogs », 21 aout 2006. [En ligne] <> (12 avril […]

  45. […] Cohen, Dan, «Professors, Start Your Blogs», blogue Dan Cohen, 21 août 2006 : […]

  46. […] Un blog è generalmente visto come qualcosa di caotico e di non strutturato. Tutto il contrario del mondo accademico e della scienza, che sono luoghi dove si suppone tutto sia ben ordinato. La maggior parte degli studenti universitari non riescono a capire quando una professore risponde “Non ho idea di cosa potrebbe accadere se rendessimo questo presupposto meno rigido”. Una questione aperta è una grande fonte di ispirazione per un blogger. Potrebbe essere l’inizio di un’indagine bibliografica, o di una rapida simulazione. Perciò il blog “offre uno spazio originale e prezioso per combinare insieme gli sforzi legati alla ricerca, alla didattica e all’assistenza” come indicato in Grollman (2014). Tecnicamente, come dicevamo nella premessa, un blog è solo una serie di voci chiamate “post”, anche se, quando vanno oltre le mille parole, potrebbero tranquillamente essere definiti “articoli”(Cohen 2006). […]

  47. […] All you can tweet. Nature Chemistry , 5. Cohen, D. (2006, 08 21). Professors, Start Your Blogs. . +Conole, G. (2007a, 10 20). The nature of academic discourse. 02 01, […]

  48. […] A blogpost from 2006 by Dan Cohen, a Digital Humanities scholar, on why academics should blog […]

  49. […] is a better chance for a Historians research to be seen. Dan Cohen wrote an entry titled, Professors, Start Your Blogs, and in that entry he advocates for the blogging […]

  50. […] in “a shameless” and “narcissistic act” in his 2006 article titled, “Professors, Start Your Blogs.” Blogging, the shameless, narcissistic endeavor, has, in the past nine years, become […]

  51. […] be a good tool for historians to use as it can bridge the gap between academics and non-academics. Dan Cohen suggests that blogging can be a powerful way to provide “notes from the field” and glosses on […]

  52. […] by blogging historians can reach out to a wider audience. In 2006 Dan Cohen wrote in his article “Professors, Start Your Blogs”, Dan Cohen (21 August 2006). that there are now a wide range of blogs available online and many of […]

  53. […] about why scholars blog. This is not a new genre. People have been encouraging academics to blog for almost a decade now. But as Russell McCutcheon, Thomas Whitley, Adam Miller, and Steven Ramey show, scholars are still […]

  54. […] Continue to read: […]

  55. […] of the most-read pieces I’ve written here remains my entreaty “Professors Start Your Blogs,” which is now 12 years old but might as well have been written in the Victorian age. […]

  56. […] Professors, Start Your Blogs […]

Leave a Reply